Here is a yet another collection of tech papers, however, in this time in a quite hand-picked manner – those most interesting ones (Voyager liquid cooled engines, Rotary engines, three lifting surfaces papers etc.):
Go to get them, good stuff.
Here is a yet another collection of tech papers, however, in this time in a quite hand-picked manner – those most interesting ones (Voyager liquid cooled engines, Rotary engines, three lifting surfaces papers etc.):
Go to get them, good stuff.
NASA TP PRELIMINARY AERODYNAMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR ADVANCED LAMINAR FLOW AIRCRAFT CONFIGURATIONS can be found from the following link. I found it quite interesting.
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19880014362_1988014362.pdf
Aerodynamic Comparison of Hyper-Elliptic Cambered Span (HECS) Wings with Conventional Configurations
I created a wiki page to katix gforge for link collection.
I hope you like it. It is not sorted in any sense, but it contains lots of interesting links. A friend of mine has been sending these to me a quite long time and I thought that I could share the collection with you.
http://gforge.katix.org/gf/project/twinzygger/wiki/?pagename=MiscTechPapers
>I created a wiki page to katix gforge for link collection.
I hope you like it. It is not sorted in any sense, but it contains lots of interesting links. A friend of mine has been sending these to me a quite long time and I thought that I could share the collection with you.
http://gforge.katix.org/gf/project/twinzygger/wiki/?pagename=MiscTechPapers
Here is a design paper about Tecnam P2006T. I find it quite interesting.
www.aidaa.it/3-2008/P2006_corr.pdf
Interesting detail with the used Rotax 912S is that it provides actually better thrust at takeoff and climb than same horse power with a Lycoming engine (because the engine nacelle has smaller frontal area and the propeller rotation speed is lower).
>Here is a design paper about Tecnam P2006T. I find it quite interesting.
www.aidaa.it/3-2008/P2006_corr.pdf
Interesting detail with the used Rotax 912S is that it provides actually better thrust at takeoff and climb than same horse power with a Lycoming engine (because the engine nacelle has smaller frontal area and the propeller rotation speed is lower).
Link:
There is link to the NLF215F airfoil tech paper. It was particularly interesting. Now I understood the philosophy of the profile – I was always wondering, why this profile has the low drag bucket at so high Cl (around 0.5) rather than what is realized in cruise with small aircraft (up to 0.2). But, it seems, that this airfoil is designed to be used with -10 degrees flaps. With those, the low drag bucket gets into the cruise area. Heureka.
Here is a direct link to the paper:
http://www.n91cz.com/Interesting_Technical_Reports/NASA-81-tp1865.pdf
>Link:
There is link to the NLF215F airfoil tech paper. It was particularly interesting. Now I understood the philosophy of the profile – I was always wondering, why this profile has the low drag bucket at so high Cl (around 0.5) rather than what is realized in cruise with small aircraft (up to 0.2). But, it seems, that this airfoil is designed to be used with -10 degrees flaps. With those, the low drag bucket gets into the cruise area. Heureka.
Here is a direct link to the paper:
http://www.n91cz.com/Interesting_Technical_Reports/NASA-81-tp1865.pdf
There is an interesting document on Selig’s page:
http://www.ae.uiuc.edu/m-selig/uiuc_lsat/vol4/NREL-SR-500-34515.pdf.
It covers for example wind tunnel results for Wortmann FX63-137 at low Reynolds numbers.
Links to NASA tech papers about airfoils
Covers NLF 215F
>There is an interesting document on Selig’s page:
http://www.ae.uiuc.edu/m-selig/uiuc_lsat/vol4/NREL-SR-500-34515.pdf.
It covers for example wind tunnel results for Wortmann FX63-137 at low Reynolds numbers.
Links to NASA tech papers about airfoils
Covers NLF 215F