High Altitude UAV Launch for Microsatellite Launcher Rocket

Rockets lifting off from the ground are inefficient and require enormous amount of fuel and especially oxidizer despite there is plenty of oxygen in the low atmosphere. Rocket engine is very inefficient too, and to save fuel, the best way is to limit the time the rocket engine is needed => more reasonable amount of fuel needs to be carried and subsequently smaller rocket is needed.

To launch microsatellites, a similar approach than Burt Rutan’s WhiteKnightTwo (or Stratolauncher) is the best way to go. The difference for a microsatellite rocket is that the payload is much more modest and a much smaller and much less expensive airplane can be used. The airplane can be either UAV or optionally piloted aircraft. If it is just pure UAV, it can be made smaller and less expensive.

The principle of this airplane would be series hybrid propulsion. There would be a small but powerful modified series turbo liquid cooled motorcycle engine turning a generator (which is also a brushless DC electric motor, but bigger than the propulsion units). The actual propulsion would be provided with several smaller electric motors which would turn relatively modest size propellers (vs. the need for prop size in the high altitude). The large number of the propulsion units would compensate for the diameter. Very large diameter in the prop would cause severe geometric problems for the aircraft (landing gear, wing placement etc. as evidenced by Grob’s high altitude aircraft), but instead lowering the disc loading of the prop by increasing the number of the props, is much less expensive and much less complicated way to do it, especially since the construction with electric motors approaches trivial.

The aerodynamics of the aircraft would be based on a high aspect ratio long wing and conventional tail placed aft of a ideal laminar pod-shaped fuselage (for UAV pod-shape would be even easier because there is no need for seating people inside and no bumps / deviations of the ideal shape are needed). The airfoil designed for the purpose would be obviously a low Re airfoil with maximized L/D at moderately high Cl (unlike the cruise-oriented airfoils presented earlier on this site).

The airplane would lift the rocket with the hybrid electric propulsion to 50000-80000 ft like e.g. the Stratolauncher does, but with the difference that the aircraft would be very inexpensive. Even 80000 feet should be possible with hybrid propulsion since when the dual turbo can not provide enough power anymore (it would cut out pretty much after 60000 according to some studies done for HALE-UAVs), it can continue climb purely by using batteries. There is a limit though how much batteries can be carried along with the plane to not lose too much of the payload (the rocket). This is a compromise that needs to be optimized carefully to maximize benefits.

The airplane would be obviously fully reusable and good for a long long time. Different kind of payloads could be accommodated, depending on the need. E.g. rocket carrying multiple microsatellites or a rocket carrying one payload or a equipment that would study higher atmosphere (without rocket) or possibly a pressurized pod housing a human (as alternative to the rocket). It would be highly interesting concept to design & implement. It requires some budget, but can be done with quite modest budget not commonly considered in the aircraft/spacecraft circles.

Marching order would be this:
First study items for this would be:
1. Determine how large rocket would be needed for reaching orbit from case 1) 50000 ft and case 2) 80000 ft. Someone familiar with rocket equations could contribute if you would be interested. Please note comments are unfortunately moderated due to spam-comment problem, and may not appear immediately (only when I have time to go to press approve).
2. Then the size of the aircraft that will lift the rocket can be determined by requirements set by 1).
3. Determine the propulsion system needed for lifting the 2) to case 1) 50000 ft and case 2) 80000 ft.

Conservative assumption would be that the aircraft would reach 50000 ft and horizontal speed would be negligible at launch altitude, and the size of the rocket would need to be determined based on that altitude (and initial speed). Then if the aircraft could be made to reach 80000 ft, it would be all plus, bigger payload could be accommodated to the rocket.

The configuration for the aircraft could be quite simple:
– 2 small pods with two tails (or interconnected tail) like Burt Rutan’s high altitude lifters leaving the center section for the payload
- one pod could house the piston engine + fuel
- another pod could house the batteries
- four wheel landing gear would be located to both pods, similarly than White Knight

About these ads
  1. Hi Karolina,4DSP recently signed a license with NASA to commercialize its break-through fiber optic sensing technology. 4DSP is already working in the UAV space to improve design and performance of the new generation of UAVs.Would you be interested in learning more about 4DSP and the NASA-developed fiber optic technology? The impact to commercial aircraft industry will be significant from a design and safety perspective.I can also direct your attention to a whitepaper on flight stress produced by 4DSP which is entitled: "Why an Airplane Bends, and How They Make Sure it Doesn't Break". The paper is an illustration of the fiber optic technology measures strain on an aircraft in flight. The whitepaper can be found at: http://www.4dsp.com/fosDocs/WP_Plane.pdf I'd be happy to send more info.Dave

  2. Hi Karolina,4DSP recently signed a license with NASA to commercialize its break-through fiber optic sensing technology. 4DSP is already working in the UAV space to improve design and performance of the new generation of UAVs.Would you be interested in learning more about 4DSP and the NASA-developed fiber optic technology? The impact to commercial aircraft industry will be significant from a design and safety perspective.I can also direct your attention to a whitepaper on flight stress produced by 4DSP which is entitled: "Why an Airplane Bends, and How They Make Sure it Doesn't Break". The paper is an illustration of the fiber optic technology measures strain on an aircraft in flight. The whitepaper can be found at: http://www.4dsp.com/fosDocs/WP_Plane.pdf I'd be happy to send more info.Dave

  3. Hi Karolina,4DSP recently signed a license with NASA to commercialize its break-through fiber optic sensing technology. 4DSP is already working in the UAV space to improve design and performance of the new generation of UAVs.Would you be interested in learning more about 4DSP and the NASA-developed fiber optic technology? The impact to commercial aircraft industry will be significant from a design and safety perspective.I can also direct your attention to a whitepaper on flight stress produced by 4DSP which is entitled: "Why an Airplane Bends, and How They Make Sure it Doesn't Break". The paper is an illustration of the fiber optic technology measures strain on an aircraft in flight. The whitepaper can be found at: http://www.4dsp.com/fosDocs/WP_Plane.pdf I'd be happy to send more info.Dave

  4. I need help from volunteers or affordable partners with a similar venture destined for a Kickstarter launch.

    http://www.facebook.com/groups/110821682303324/
    http://exospace.wordpress.com/

    http://animoto.com/play/TD8F8WTvnbrYD3UphILCzw

  1. No trackbacks yet.

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: